Helping ESL and EFL students with difficult English grammar rules and empowering ELTs with ESL worksheets and materials.
Teachers Finding Students 101 Non-Twitter users are destroying the English language
Avatar

Non-Twitter users are destroying the English language

PDFPrintE-mail
Saturday, 12 September 2009 13:04
Written by Neal Chambers

Okay so I might have gone a little out on a limb with this, but please hear me out.  Twitter and Facebook and other social media outlets get some flak from time to time for 'destroying the English language.'  Critics claim that in our fast paced society we aren't stopping to check our grammar, and that if things continue this way we will tear a whole in the very fabric of communication, destroying any hope of our little ones interacting with each other in an intelligent way.

But I say it isn't true.  I say Twitter is actually a boon for the English language.  It's a gift we should be cherishing instead of rushing to chastise.  I say embrace the 140 characters.  Champion it as the savior of language, a symbol of all that is right with good writing.  I will even go so far as to say that if you are not using Twitter you may actually be hurting your writing abilities and in turn destroying the English language. (ok, so maybe not destroying the English language, but I thought I'd be controversial)

Who doesn't use Twitter?  These people definitely don't.

Businesspeople seem to think that the more convoluted the language they use the more intelligent they sound.  Here is a prime example of blantant overuse of business-ese (I have left the name out to protect the fairly innocent):

"Every great global brand addresses multiple layers of consciousness yet, in every case, the different layers exist primarily to fortify the foundation message and secondly to provide focus for marketing and operations."

Huh?  I think he was trying to say that a global brand appeals to people in many ways and reinforces a company's core principles and provides focus for the company.  But, that's just my guess.

Politicians even get in on the act:

"The rugged rugged hardy people that live up here and some of the most patriotic people whom you will ever know live here, and one thing that you are known for is your steadfast support of our military community up here and I thank you for that and thank you United States military for protecting the greatest nation on Earth." - Sarah Palin

I admit that this is like shooting fish in a barrel, but it's still worth quoting because this woman was in charge of Alaska and almost became Vice President of the United States.  That's a little scary isn't it? I think what she wanted to say was "There are rugged patriotic people up here that always support our military which protects the greatest nation on Earth."  This quote came from her infamous farewell speech.  I dare you to make sense of the rest of it.

140 characters was enough for them, why isn't it enough for you?

If you look back at some of the great catch phrases of all time, you will find that they all have a lot in common.  They are usually concise, don't require the use of a dictionary to understand, and a majority (not all) are under 140 characters:

"I have a dream." - Martin Luther King

"... the only thing we have to fear is fear itself." - Franklin D. Roosevelt

"And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you - ask what you can do for your country. " - John F. Kennedy

These phrases were instantly understood.  Nobody had to reach for a dictionary or wait around until the hot air stopped.  People knew exactly what the speakers were saying.

Advertising is also full of examples of short sayings:

"Have it your way." - Burger King (Pretty simple right?  You can ask them to make a burger for you the way you want it.)

"A diamond is forever." - De Beers (If you want your marriage to last forever, the symbol of that marriage better last forever too.)

"Breakfast of Champions." - Wheaties (Well if a champion eats it, then it has to be healthy.)

If it's worth saying, you can say it in 140 characters.  Or you can at least pique someone's interest in it.  Then write a blog post to back it up.

It's all about your audience

You have to write for your audience and the majority of people out there do not want to reach for a dictionary or read a long monotone spiel.  They'll fall asleep long before you've made your point.  I know it's a little sad.  I know you just learned that big new dictionary.com word of the day and would love to show it off to people, but make sure you know your audience before you do.

Twitter has an estimated 24 million or so users.  That's a big audience and it's still growing.  These are people worth talking to and networking with.  The limitations of the system can actually make your writing better and clearer.  I challenge you to try to pack as much as you can into that next Tweet.  It's pretty difficult but with practice it can make you a great teacher and idea spreader.

Do you have some other short concise famous quotes?  I'd like to hear about your favorites.  Or do you have any wordy quotes from your favorite businessperson or politician?  Let me know about it in the comments below.

We are also working on a training kit for Twitter.  If you have a few moments could you fill out a survey on Twitter for us?  Your ideas will help us make a great training kit.  Thanks in advance for the help!

Last Updated on Sunday, 13 September 2009 16:00
 

Comments  

 
0 #4 I don't think anything could kill your blogNeal Chambers 2009-09-17 10:59
A way to think of Twitter is that it's a big party. You go there hang out, talk to a few people, meet a few new people, just like a real world party, except that this party happens to have 45 million or so people at it.

Now, the natural thing to do is to have your own little party at your place, maybe have a little barbecue or a round of poker. 'Your place' on the net is your blog. When people come to your house they look at your pictures and your big screen TV, and learn more about you. That's basically what a blog is right? You have all your thoughts and ideas laid out there for everyone to see and respond to.

So no, Twitter will not kill your blog (It's just a poor little bird) but it will definitely help you meet more people to invite back to your place for a little shindig. And if you are not going to parties and meeting new people you might turn into that crazy old lady with all the cats that hosts the bridge game every Saturday night. ;-)
Quote
 
 
0 #3 Sandy 2009-09-16 12:36
Well, I still haven't joined the twittering (tweetering?) classes yet, and I can't say I'm in a rush to. What are the benefits of it? More importantly - what the hell is it? I've still no idea, other than some vague notion it involves sending text messages via your phone to, erm, cyberspace. Is that it? Could it possibly replace blogging? More to the point, could it spell the death of MY blog?!?
Quote
 
 
0 #2 Long-form writingNeal Chambers 2009-09-14 10:48
Anne,

I definitely think longer writing is going to be around for awhile. However, I think that a good writer should be able to pack an idea in to a short saying or sentence. Then, the author can back up his idea with facts and examples in an essay or speech. I mean what makes you buy a book? I would say the title of the book is a big factor in that decision. Now, of course there is word-of-mouth and the back cover and some other things, but the title is usually what will help or hurt the most. It's the same with a blog post.

Twitter helps writers because it makes you draw out just what is important. And that's how a lot of new forms of communication (TV, newspaper, blog posts, social media) are these days. The average blog reader only spends about 30 seconds on a page to read it. Looking at my web stats, I can verify that. As a writer you should know your medium and realize that there are different styles of communication and that they should be understood not chastised for being new.

In other words, whether you like it or not, your audience doesn't usually have time or the desire to read a lot (online at least). They skim and scan articles for important information. So short, concise bits of information are very valuable for getting your point across.

Novels and essays (in their paper forms) are a different animal. People will usually sit down and actually take the time to read these. Blog posts, on average, get significantly less attention. I'm not saying the content is less valuable, just that's how people behave.

Thanks for commenting Anne!

Neal
Quote
 
 
0 #1 Anne 2009-09-14 08:34
Hi Neal,

I do agree that brilliant ideas can be expressed in a few polished words. On the other hand, multidimensiona l trains of thought will need a few more. In fact, I think that the writing process teases out thinking and is therefor a constructive activity in its own right. Essays and novels - and blogs - are here to stay!

No? Anne
Quote
 

Add comment

Anything that is respectful and contributes to the article will be accepted.


Security code
Refresh

rss-green-64

Follow
EnglishSpark

feed-icon-orange-32-desat
Blog
ESL materials
Materials
facebook-hand-drawn-32youtube-hand-drawn-32twitter-hand-drawn-32
EnglishSpark recommends Learn any language quickly!
Click the image above to start speaking a language from day 1.

What do you do?

Live Chat by comm100